PRO WRESTLING / A LIVING REFERENCETake the library offline
← Match study

Match studyAll levels

Randy Savage vs. Ricky Steamboat

Make each cover feel like an attempt to win.

Also called: WrestleMania III

CRITIC’S RATING★ 5.00John Canton
EVENTWrestleMania III29 March 1987
Read the rating source ↗

Match synopsis

Spoilers follow. Savage defends the Intercontinental title against Steamboat. Repeated near falls keep changing the pressure, and Steamboat ultimately wins the championship with a small package. George Steele and the referee become part of the closing sequence.

The reviewer’s perspective

Canton awards five stars and singles out the purposeful covers and near falls as expressions of the wrestlers’ desire to win.

The rating is a named critic’s judgment. It is not a consensus score, and the study notes do not claim to be a new review based on a complete viewing.

Watch with a question

These prompts are editorial. Watch once for the complete story, then use a second viewing to investigate:

  • What makes two near falls feel different even when the count is the same?
  • How quickly do they move from an unsuccessful cover to their next intention?
  • What earlier story information makes the ringside involvement understandable?

A useful takeaway

Do not mistake frequent near falls for a formula. Ask what each attempt changes before borrowing the structure.

Access notes

The linked upload is from WWE or WWE Vault. It requires internet and may be restricted or removed by the publisher. The article and these questions remain available in the offline edition; the video does not.

WATCH THE REFERENCE

Randy Savage vs. Ricky Steamboat · official WWE Vault full match

If playback is unavailable in your region, open the original source ↗.

THE PAPER TRAIL

Sources & context

Named critic’s review

Randy Savage vs. Ricky Steamboat — WrestleMania III review ↗

John Canton · TJR Wrestling

The 5.00-star rating is John Canton’s own assessment. Synopsis and critical perspective are short paraphrases; study questions are our editorial prompts.